The
Denver Post’s Kevin Simpson reports on an original market research from
GOP-aligned polling solid Magellan Strategies. Not surprisingly, this market
research shows this year’s teach finance initiative, Amendment 66, in “serious
discontent.”
A
survey by Louisville-based Magellan Strategies found with the aim of lone 7
percent of 600 likely voters assumed they were “extremely informed” in the
region of the anticipated amendment, which would revise the way education funds
are parceled dazed to teach districts and situate more money with respect to
stretched out crиche, kindergarten, at-risk students and English-language
learners.
Focusing
on the blame ramifications, which would provide means for a two-step state
takings blame strengthen, the market research asked two questions. First, it
asked single with token in sequence in the region of the amendment and at that
moment a back up question with more detailed in sequence in the region of the
anticipated original blame edifice.
In
the broad-spectrum question, 44 percent indicated they would oppose the gauge,
compared with 38 percent in support and 18 percent undecided.
In
the margin next to the gauge widened with the more detailed question, as 52
percent assumed they conflicting it to 38 percent in support and 10 percent
undecided. [Pols emphasis]
Sounds
pretty bad meant for the teach finance initiative, doesn’t it? That’s in great
part of the reason that the Post didn’t tell its readers no matter which in the
region of who made this market research, or come again? It in point of fact
asked in the way of questions. For with the aim of to a certain extent most
important part of the story, we ought to walk to FOX 31′s Eli Stokols:
he results themselves aren’t quite as meek as Coloradans meant for Real
Education Reform, the site with the aim of paid meant for the market research,
argue.
First
inedible, the team weighting minute for this survey is set to 39% Republican,
34% Democrat and 27% unaffiliated — Magellan calls it a “good projection of
2013 turnout demographics”, and it could well be.
Initially,
as soon as respondents were asked in the region of Amendment 66 exclusive of
being told more in the region to come again? It does, the initiative is down by
a 52-33 percent margin with men.
But,
women supported it by a 42-37 percent margin and Hispanics favored it by a
53-34 percent margin…
The
same as Stokols takes the point in time to explain someplace the Post didn’t,
this market research was more or a lesser amount of engineered to make the
product sought by opponents of Amendment 66. Magellan claims with the aim of
after voter suit “informed” in the region of the initiative, support meant for
Amendment 66 drops across the board–but the “additional information” agreed in
this market research says nothing in the region of come again? The money would
be spent on. Not even with the aim of it’s an education initiative by the side
of all! Naturally, if your “additional information” consists solely of how much
more intimates will forfeit, exclusive of as well as no matter which in the
region of come again? They’re paying meant for, it’s not vacant to be standard
very auspicious. Proponents understand with the aim of their winner depends on
come again? Voters will find meaning for their money, someplace opponents
geographically lone poverty to parley in the region of the cost.
Kudos
to Eli Stokols meant for asking the very basic questions with the aim of
dramatically coins the story of this market research. Magellan Strategies,
meant for context, in addition predicted with the aim of Ryan Frazier would
defeat Ed Perlmutter in 2010, and Magellan first in command David Flaherty even
predicted with the aim of time with the aim of Tom Tancredo “will suit
Colorado’s subsequently manager.” Safe to say, their track chronicle is varied
by the side of the top
.
No comments:
Post a Comment